1. Introduction

I "The fight against pedophilia" is a trap!

1. Introduction 

On the beginning, I would like to make it clear that I am absolutely against to any sexual abuse of children and any sexual "awareness" of them.

However, the very issue of pedophilia - what it is - as well as the fight against it, I see a little differently from what is commonly "thought" today, and in my opinion what has been imposed on people by the mainstream, using our empathy and concern for children in this aspect, which rightly tells us to protect their innocence.

I would like you to understand that pedophilia is NOT sexual abuse of children; raping them, or filming it, or having pornography with such filth, etc. Pedophilia is the perception of children's beauty, including sexual beauty, but it is not automatically followed by any intentions or deeds. 
-AND IT HAS TO BE KEEP THESE THINGS SEPARATE FROM EACH OTHER!
 Why do I think it's so important...?

From my own observations (...) I have long since deduced that pedophilia is quite a common thing among people, especially men. In my opinion, every Human [to some extent] is a pedophile or gerantophile - that is, that he or she likes younger or older people more. {*}

{*Once I read on Onet (Polish web page) about some 'nymphophiles' abusing young girls... Like "hebephilia", in my opinion it is an artificial word, created to keep alive the myth that pedophilia is something extremely rare and the conviction that any "...philia" is always about some kind of 'transition to action' - at least watching pornography with this "...philia".}

And the point is that by calling child sex offenders pedophiles, and defining "pedophilia" a set of certain pathological and criminal behaviors and by expressing publicly your condemnation of the mere perception of the sexual attraction to children, you condemn many innocent people to the psychosis of fear, a sense of exclusion, being commonly hated and, besides, addictions, a mass of other emotional problems and, above all, sexual problems.

And also yourself to self-destruction...

-I'm proving in this work that regardless of sexual orientation, age, gender, occupation or race, "fight against pedophilia" only harms us all... (unless you are the beneficiaries of this psychosis... )

We must condemn specific condemnable acts, not Human sexuality (whatever it may be). It can (should) be tamed and controlled, but it cannot be chosen or changed. (at least sexuality; harmful fetishs/favorites can be unlearned{*}) Besides... If someone rapes a woman, will you condemn him for heterosexuality or for rape? Have you ever heard in the media that a rapist or harassing boss "has committed (or has been committing) heterosexuality"? With pedophilia and behaviors that may possibly and only indirectly result from pedophilia, in my opinion it is completely the same.

{*Sexual likes/reflexes and fetishes are another matter. A healthy liking is, for example, a particular love of oral-genital sex. Sadomasochism (BDSM) is such a harmful reflex. I do not condemn anyone with such a predilection (as long as they do not harm outsiders, children or animals), but it is not something healthy or natural and always results from some kind of harm that was so much or so intense that they learned to reproduce it and enjoy it (...).
Fetishes are also divided into normal, healthy and disgusting, pushed to people's throats mainly via the Internet. Healthy is, for example, my fetish for legs and buttocks (this is my most important criterion for assessing the beauty of both women and girls). The latter is a attraction to corpses, animals, urine, faeces... etc. If a person has caught on something like this, then until he or she has killed anyone and harmed any Human or animal, you have nothing to condemn him or her for. The condemnation of any sexual perversions only deepens the problem, increasingly isolating such people in their own worlds... In order to be able to heal oneself from such a thing (or noxious preferences), one has to find a cause within oneself and work out the cause. (and above all, do not feel persecuted...)}

It's just that no one who likes children automatically becomes a criminal because of that. And this, in my opinion, is not a disease or deviation, and telling such things to all pedophiles only exacerbates the problems that the "fight against pedophilia" supposedly fights against.

In order to explain exactly what I mean, I will first use my example, and then one by one explain you in details all effects of the "fight against pedophilia" I see on the present world.

.. Because there are so many of them, I don't know if I can see them all... Even the children's fairy tales have fallen victim to this trap. Writers like Andersen, the brothers Grimm, and Carroll don't occur anymore, because can you imagine a man today writing a fairy tale like "Thumbelina" - a little girl from a flower...? Kate Rowling can write her own fairy tale, and except for certain considerations of generally presented values (...), she is doing it quite well. But the best fairy tales were always written by men because they were child loving pedophiles and made them with love. They could best understand the children's psyche and their needs... But today men, when they write fairy tales, are at most some psychotic nightmares like "Coraline" to hide under the guise of some "macabre" that they would actually want to write about children and for children...