6.2 "The fight against pedophilia" and emotional disorders
Here I'll start with a Polish scandalous "fight against pedophilia" spot, which appeared during the creation of this campaign. It was a little girl with an undressed doll, who suddenly started to dress her up as if her life depended on it... -It was even soaked with such extreme negativity in the sense of emotional perception, and finally, to sum up this sick projection, "an evil touch hurts all life".
I remember watching it, I had enough - I felt despondent and as if I felt the dirt perversely, to the limit of the twisted fear pumped into this spot. In such situations, I resorted to masturbation, but not in order to imagine this or other girl, but in order to shed the stigma of the emotional dirt that this campaign entailed... -secondly to keep the rest from going crazy...
And what was this sick spot supposed to bring, what did it give good to anyone, what problem did it solve? Because I only see problems caused by it, not solved. Certainly it wasn't only me who caused such an extremely negative experience. But (also for sure) unfortunately, not everyone reacted as I did, and I would bet that even if I did not take into account all the rest of this pumped-up hatred and fear into pedophilia, it is just this spot caused many sexually harmed children on its conscience.
However, years of social alienation have finally made me immune to such things. That's why I don't expect any compassion or anything like that from you. But if I, a teenager at the time, saw it and experienced something like that, then what did little children experience? Can you imagine that feeling of threat, crushing their little throats, that incomprehensible fear and shame that seeps into their innocent souls? -I think something like this is emotional sexual harassment and should be punished!
There are also many situations where people are afraid for their children in the context of the possibility of using them. I suppose I myself was the reason for such fear of the father of my cute neighbour, whose beauty I considered perfect. When I saw her for the first time, she delighted me so much that I didn't control my way of looking at her, which exposed me to her family and brought me a lot of fear (each time I met her) and suffering in general.
And yet it didn't have to look like that - I could have a cordial relationship with her, like a neighbour with a neighbour; then I would smile and greet her without fear, and she wouldn't become the reason for my obsession. In such a situation, her father would certainly not have to worry about her in my context. I also think it wouldn't hurt at all if I told her that she's gorgeous, that I'm delighted with her appearance. (for a few years to tell her that - it was my greatest dream...) What hasn't only destroyed me and maybe not only me those years? -It was "fight against pedophilia." {*}
{*This is what I'm describing in detail at the end in "My Greatest Love".}
poniedziałek, 27 kwietnia 2020
6.3 "Fighting pedophilia" and "bearing a new man”.
6.3 "Fighting pedophilia" and "bearing a new man”.
"Fighting pedophilia" is generally said to prejudice children. Although I think it is absurd to give all rights to children{*}, as Child Liberation proposes, "the fight against pedophilia" promotes and imposes something counterproductive instead of a healthy balance, as I have already mentioned in terms of the impact of "the fight against pedophilia" on children.
{*Related this thought in chapter 11.}
Systems rooted in Marxism, such as communism and all forms of socialism, have one thing in common - the 'improvement' of people to a certain pattern strictly defined by the system. This is called the "bearing of a new man".
Pure Marxism, called communism, or "real socialism" saw its "new man" in a completely enslaved society; completely equal to the individual. -With no ambition, or any higher aspirations, to realize the economic productivity of the state, strictly defined and controlled by the 'party line'. Therefore, in this "paradise on Earth", the entire intellectual elite ("bourgeoisie", "kulaks"...) had to be eliminated to be able to build something like this.
Today's Euro-socialism (or American socialism) also creates a new man. This "new being" is a man who thinks that he lives in a free world and that he has his own opinion and, thanks to democracy, has an illusory sense of control over what is happening... Of course, no matter how many "ideas" the mainstream wastewater rejects, it is also a man who "fights against pedophilia". Whether or not he sees anything harmful in it or not, he still "fights it", because any attempt to object this 'noble campaign' seems to be far worse than suicide... Thanks to "the fight against pedophilia" and the consequent growth of the "public enemy NO1", even the biggest opponents of the mainstream found themselves in its clutches - in some dependence on it...
In short (because I don't think there needs more to it), the point is that this "public enemy of NO1", which is now a "pedophile", is to be able to manipulate ('polarize') a social moods. For political scandals, scams, or economic/social problems, the media can always draw their 'favourite enemy' to distract attention from them and thus alleviate social unrest... "Anything else people might underestimate, but they just have to be outraged at pedophilia..." The media know this very well and often cynically use it against you... (as a model example for me, it's a Polish case of the ending sentence and the release of the criminal Trynkiewicz, which rolled over and over, effectively distracted attention from the "gambling scandal"...)
And this is how the modern "new man" is created. Consciously, most of you think that everything is all right, subconsciously, or at least in a way that is very deeply pushed out of your consciousness, many of you have some doubts about the correctness of the direction in which the world is currently going, but hardly anyone is leaning out. Because those who have the courage to say what they think, like Korwin Mikke (Polish conservative), are presented throughout the mainstream as dangerous madmen, anti-social or even handicapped... -and people raised on spiritually empty materialism feel safer and more comfortable in the herd. And almost no one who has any doubts about the whole ideology of "the fight against pedophilia" dare to say anything about it, even among the closest family members...
It should be added here that many parents, like the socialist systems in which they live, have also taken on the role of "bearing a new man", only on a micro-scale. And I don't mean the reproductive character of their bedroom... Through some of their own unsatisfied ambitions, unfulfilled desires or failures in life, they try to make 'Super Beings' of their children. They often fail to see that too little free time disturbs their emotional development{*} because they are convinced that their children "will thank them anyway in the future". In addition, "the fight against pedophilia" has taught them to think that children are 'yet to be Human'. -so they often don't see in them beings with their own emotions, problems, concepts, etc., only a diamond, which they have to grind as best they can.
{*Everyone needs a well-balanced time - work, free time and time to sleep on weekdays, and everyone needs a rest from work. Children need even more free time to rest and play, because to the daily hardships of life a person should adjust gradually.}
Such a tragic example of creating 'Super Beings' from children was a young Russian model recently martyred to death on one of the Chinese catwalks. Her mother wanted to make a model out of her at any cost, so this girl ended up in China, because in Russia, where she lived, the possibility of employing models under sixteen years old was forbidden. {*} In my opinion, parents are primarily guilty of her death, although I also don't take responsibility for the fashion designers who employ her, who don't see a Human in her, but only business (and possibly a 'tasty view'). -This is a terrible abuse, for which they should be severely punished, and the rest should learn a lesson to prevent this from happening in the future.
{*Russia aspiring to Western modernity is "fighting very hard against pedophilia", while the Chinese communists apparently don't care too much about it. Where they care too much about it, children are raped, while where they don't care about their fate, they die. - These extremes again... Personally, I think that child modelling, especially photomodelling, should be certainly allowed, but under clearly defined conditions. There should be a worldwide regulation on this issue, which would prevent such agencies and their photographers from taking pictures or films with arranged licentious poses etc. Besides, all such agencies should be closely monitored for any abuse; not just sexual abuse - I think organisations currently "fighting pedophilia" would be well in this role. And one more thing - in my opinion, in order to introduce normality into the whole "children's fashion" industry, they have to stop lying that "this is not about any pedophilia...". I remember the now non-existent page of "Tiny Models Central", where there were the most licentious poses of little girls I've ever seen, although 'without nudity' and 'legal'. Before entering these galleries you could read something like, "it's promoting young talents, it's not about getting anyone aroused, and we're against pedophilia...". -I hate such a crap. Of course, it's about pedophilia in such websites, and it has to make it clear at the outset to think about how to completely effectively protect the integrity and dignity of the children involved. Pretty girls generally love to be admired, so I don't see any contraindications for them to play modelling or photomodelling in their free time, as part of their hobby/self-realisation. But in order to be safe, it is necessary to clean up this business from all lies. Because even the advertisements of "Danone" or others with children are also about pedophilia. -Advertisers know very well that pretty children will attract consumers' attention, that's why in almost all ads with children such pretty slim kids are present there...}
"Fighting pedophilia" is generally said to prejudice children. Although I think it is absurd to give all rights to children{*}, as Child Liberation proposes, "the fight against pedophilia" promotes and imposes something counterproductive instead of a healthy balance, as I have already mentioned in terms of the impact of "the fight against pedophilia" on children.
{*Related this thought in chapter 11.}
Systems rooted in Marxism, such as communism and all forms of socialism, have one thing in common - the 'improvement' of people to a certain pattern strictly defined by the system. This is called the "bearing of a new man".
Pure Marxism, called communism, or "real socialism" saw its "new man" in a completely enslaved society; completely equal to the individual. -With no ambition, or any higher aspirations, to realize the economic productivity of the state, strictly defined and controlled by the 'party line'. Therefore, in this "paradise on Earth", the entire intellectual elite ("bourgeoisie", "kulaks"...) had to be eliminated to be able to build something like this.
Today's Euro-socialism (or American socialism) also creates a new man. This "new being" is a man who thinks that he lives in a free world and that he has his own opinion and, thanks to democracy, has an illusory sense of control over what is happening... Of course, no matter how many "ideas" the mainstream wastewater rejects, it is also a man who "fights against pedophilia". Whether or not he sees anything harmful in it or not, he still "fights it", because any attempt to object this 'noble campaign' seems to be far worse than suicide... Thanks to "the fight against pedophilia" and the consequent growth of the "public enemy NO1", even the biggest opponents of the mainstream found themselves in its clutches - in some dependence on it...
In short (because I don't think there needs more to it), the point is that this "public enemy of NO1", which is now a "pedophile", is to be able to manipulate ('polarize') a social moods. For political scandals, scams, or economic/social problems, the media can always draw their 'favourite enemy' to distract attention from them and thus alleviate social unrest... "Anything else people might underestimate, but they just have to be outraged at pedophilia..." The media know this very well and often cynically use it against you... (as a model example for me, it's a Polish case of the ending sentence and the release of the criminal Trynkiewicz, which rolled over and over, effectively distracted attention from the "gambling scandal"...)
And this is how the modern "new man" is created. Consciously, most of you think that everything is all right, subconsciously, or at least in a way that is very deeply pushed out of your consciousness, many of you have some doubts about the correctness of the direction in which the world is currently going, but hardly anyone is leaning out. Because those who have the courage to say what they think, like Korwin Mikke (Polish conservative), are presented throughout the mainstream as dangerous madmen, anti-social or even handicapped... -and people raised on spiritually empty materialism feel safer and more comfortable in the herd. And almost no one who has any doubts about the whole ideology of "the fight against pedophilia" dare to say anything about it, even among the closest family members...
It should be added here that many parents, like the socialist systems in which they live, have also taken on the role of "bearing a new man", only on a micro-scale. And I don't mean the reproductive character of their bedroom... Through some of their own unsatisfied ambitions, unfulfilled desires or failures in life, they try to make 'Super Beings' of their children. They often fail to see that too little free time disturbs their emotional development{*} because they are convinced that their children "will thank them anyway in the future". In addition, "the fight against pedophilia" has taught them to think that children are 'yet to be Human'. -so they often don't see in them beings with their own emotions, problems, concepts, etc., only a diamond, which they have to grind as best they can.
{*Everyone needs a well-balanced time - work, free time and time to sleep on weekdays, and everyone needs a rest from work. Children need even more free time to rest and play, because to the daily hardships of life a person should adjust gradually.}
Such a tragic example of creating 'Super Beings' from children was a young Russian model recently martyred to death on one of the Chinese catwalks. Her mother wanted to make a model out of her at any cost, so this girl ended up in China, because in Russia, where she lived, the possibility of employing models under sixteen years old was forbidden. {*} In my opinion, parents are primarily guilty of her death, although I also don't take responsibility for the fashion designers who employ her, who don't see a Human in her, but only business (and possibly a 'tasty view'). -This is a terrible abuse, for which they should be severely punished, and the rest should learn a lesson to prevent this from happening in the future.
{*Russia aspiring to Western modernity is "fighting very hard against pedophilia", while the Chinese communists apparently don't care too much about it. Where they care too much about it, children are raped, while where they don't care about their fate, they die. - These extremes again... Personally, I think that child modelling, especially photomodelling, should be certainly allowed, but under clearly defined conditions. There should be a worldwide regulation on this issue, which would prevent such agencies and their photographers from taking pictures or films with arranged licentious poses etc. Besides, all such agencies should be closely monitored for any abuse; not just sexual abuse - I think organisations currently "fighting pedophilia" would be well in this role. And one more thing - in my opinion, in order to introduce normality into the whole "children's fashion" industry, they have to stop lying that "this is not about any pedophilia...". I remember the now non-existent page of "Tiny Models Central", where there were the most licentious poses of little girls I've ever seen, although 'without nudity' and 'legal'. Before entering these galleries you could read something like, "it's promoting young talents, it's not about getting anyone aroused, and we're against pedophilia...". -I hate such a crap. Of course, it's about pedophilia in such websites, and it has to make it clear at the outset to think about how to completely effectively protect the integrity and dignity of the children involved. Pretty girls generally love to be admired, so I don't see any contraindications for them to play modelling or photomodelling in their free time, as part of their hobby/self-realisation. But in order to be safe, it is necessary to clean up this business from all lies. Because even the advertisements of "Danone" or others with children are also about pedophilia. -Advertisers know very well that pretty children will attract consumers' attention, that's why in almost all ads with children such pretty slim kids are present there...}
7. Legal bubbles of "the fight against pedophilia" and their consequences
7. Legal bubbles of "the fight against pedophilia" and their consequences
One girl, whom I have unnecessarily and thoughtlessly attacked on the Internet (today I regret it and I think there is nothing could add about it here), who "by a slippery slope" found out about my pedophilia and who unknowingly gave me the motivation to write this work, sent me a message where she asked if I knew that "pedophilia in Poland is punished". I have no intention of fighting her anymore, but let me answer her question here, in this work. -I just don't know that.
..I know that (VERY RIGHTLY) all forms of child sexual abuse are punished, but I haven't heard of a law in any country punishing pedophilia itself. If it was, it would have to sound like that:
"Anyone who publicly admits to having sexual inclinations or fantasies about children and/or to perceiving in them any sexual attraction, or it will be proved to have such an attraction (by discovering an interest in children's fashion, having, or viewing photographs of not their children, or observing and testifying by credible witnesses; friends, neighbors, colleagues, etc.) shall be punished by (...)".
Fortunately, there is no such thing anywhere. At least not yet, because the law in the UK is already very close to punishing pedophilia itself...
Various bubbles have arisen in connection with this psychosis, to which I am going to refer here, but this law, that is, the actual persecution of pedophiles for sexuality, and has nothing to do with child protection. The point is that in the UK, if someone who has a proven sexual interest in children has pictures of them, that will be treated by the justice system as child pornography, although that will be completely innocent, as pictures made by proud parents on the Instagram.
Even in the case of the other bubbles discussed here, one could find by force some intention to protect children. -But here? How do they want to prevent the filthy acts against them if they pump frustration among pedophiles in such a perfidious way? Besides, I'd ask the English themselves: what's wrong with someone admiring the beauty of your children? -What's so terrible about it? -Why? Child pornography is terrible because it's a registered filthy abuse that teaches abuse to others, but what can be terrible about admiring beauty? Masturbation...? As I've written, everyone is responsible for their actions. -But do you prefer your pedophiles to masturbate to the pictures you make public, or to think about other ways to satisfy themselves sexually? -Yeah.
No one can escape their libido, as is clearly seen among Catholic priests, where sexual pathologies multiply in them like mushrooms after rain through celibacy. So I guess it's better not to limit the possibility of sexual gratification to someone who doesn't do any harm and doesn't want to look at it or support it. (?) If you are so disturbed by the very fact that someone can admire the beauty of your children in pictures, just don't make them public. Problem solved.
Besides, how can you call pornography something that is not? Don't you see anything wrong with the fact that the pictures of your children you have taken yourself could be called "pornographic" in some English court, being used as evidence of sexual guilt against someone? I suppose you might think that masturbating to children's pictures 'offends their dignity'. But if that's the point, then try to answer yourself in what way. But calling them "pornographic" in my opinion is clearly doing it. I have never liked pornography of any kind... I just associate it with something dirty - and it's with all my libertarian approach to sex. If the point is that if something starts to get sexually aroused, it becomes "pornographic" automatically, how would some pretty actress posing in Playboy feel if someone said her session was pornographic?
I'm very attached to my collection... I remember how happy I was when thanks to "Little Prince" I discovered pages with little photo models. -that I could finally admire the beauty of tiny little pretty ladies without fear and legally... Although I am able to see the beauty and satisfy myself sexually with adult girls, but they never wanted me (at least those that I liked). Therefore, after many failures and love failures, and taking into account the fear that always accompanied me during flirting attempts, I simply gave up and stopped even dreaming about creating any relationship... And I always liked the girls more. So since I had the opportunity to admire them in the pictures, I became somehow 'fulfilled in life'... (if it could be call like that, considering my own limitations)
The legality of my cutties collection when I feel cursed and persecuted by everyone around me for my sexual orientation is the last bastion of my sense of sexual freedom. I can't imagine losing it... Especially since the girls in the pictures introduce 'colors' into my 'black and white' life. -It is for me, above all, the satisfaction of my sensitivity to beauty, because the beauty of the girls makes me feel something of affection... It is so emotionally deep that it is even hard for me to describe it... And you may believe it or not, but in my opinion, the satisfaction of libido is less important to me than just experiencing this admiration...
Now I'm going to take the care Polish law, which I've already mentioned in connection with Bear and his outlawed side...
This "prohibiting on promotion or support pedophile content" is first of all contrary to the Polish constitution, which prohibits the so-called "preventive censorship", and is also quite imprecise. {*} But what's problem - in something as 'noble' as "the fight against pedophilia", the constitution and the rule of law does not count for anyone (in this case not only for PiS). The so called 'Law on Beasts', which was supposed to keep the already mentioned Trynkiewicz in prison, is equally contradictory to the constitution, but I am not going to stick to it. (well, at least that's good...)
{*Although I condemn all forms of sexual abuse of children, can the Polish "justice system" manage to pull up this work under "pedophile content", because I do not present the word "pedophilia" in a pejorative sense? That's what this work is about, that this word in its true definition has absolutely no such meaning...! Besides, in my opinion, when they wanted to introduce something like that, out of respect for lawmaking, they should precisely define what the law is about - for example "(...) content promoting or supporting any violation of sexual integrity of people under fifteen years of age (...)". Because What means "pedophilic content"?! Personally, "pedophilic content", which offends me and my dignity, I know only from the media...! That's why, in my opinion, every MP and senator who voted "yes" simply spit on the seriousness of his office and lawmaking...}
Like I said, there is no good side of child sexual abuse. However, in order to change (straighten out) the convictions of a man who is errs, who generally wants to do well, but because of loneliness and the feeling of general hatred towards him, he has got a little lost (...) the worst thing you can do is gag him so that he can't speak and suffocate in his own frustration! {*}
{*I'll throw in a digression here that one paedophile I met on Virtous Pedophiles told me that such things should be censored, because thanks to such Bear, a lot of pedophiles probably took advantage of his "positive paedophile codex" and hurt children. Surely, but apart from children, everyone is responsible for themselves (Bear, from what he wrote, never abused any child), and besides, take understand that censorship does not solve problems at all, that it can only give these pedophiles the wrong conviction about the rightness of their demands. -Something like that: "they have no arguments against us, so they censor us..." It can also be added that this law will still not manage to cleanse even the ordinary Internet (clear net) from "positive pedophilia", if only because it operates only in Poland. (each country has their own bubbles... ) Therefore the only really effective solution to counteract this harmful philosophy is to confront it with the truth. -But for this it takes first rejection of another harmful philosophy, which by definition does not use the truth, but only dogma, threats and epithets, means "the fight against pedophilia".}
Agreement is based on dialogue; on a mutual desire to understand each other. And it is not about any acceptance of wild adoption, 'massages' or other crazy ideas of Bear, but only directing epithets and threats at him, how was he could understand anything? How was I supposed to understand if I didn't finally find a kindly person, ready to discuss it with me in Human terms? {*}
{*In Human terms, not like using below-the-belt punches like sexist associations or some kind of expression bomb, as my father always did. To be able to talk frankly and Humanly with some pedophile (who remained Human) about his sexuality, you have to stop associating it with any kind of getting to children (which he never did and he doesn't intend to if he remained Human). And to put it simply, to respect a man who wants a dialogue. My father has always preferred media-style debates, as he learned from mainstream television - not to get to the truth, but to destroy the opponent with his own arguments; to drag him into a blind alley to bend and feel like a winner... (and by the way feed on the frustration of the defeated one) I hate such like that...}
Gagging people's lips with "the fight against pedophilia" or "fight against hate speech" is fuelling social tensions, where there is no understanding of each other, but only more and more hatred on both sides.
Another, but much more harmful law against "pedophilia" is the total prohibition on parents of over seven years old from touching them in Sweden. In reference to the children, I have already written that it is a production of generations spoiled by the orphanage disease... 'In the name of the higher good', this law emotionally destroys whole generations of people, and many Scandinavians are certainly aware of this, but no one opposes it for fear of this terrible slander (...)!
Because the sexual sphere is strongly connected with the emotional sphere. They are not the same as Freud claimed, but they are completely interdependent mechanisms. If somebody has emotions in order and is generally happy in life, then one can safely assume that everything is fine with his sexual sphere. On the other hand, if someone suffers from depression, neurosis, anxiety, or other emotional disorders, something is certainly not right there...
And it is worth emphasizing here that this also applies to children. Of course, in children sexuality is realized a little differently, but it is a physiological need of every Human, the lack of which simply kills. There is such a thing as a body map. Everyone has it; different for parents, colleagues, lovers, and also children. (Lovers also sometimes have nooks and crannies inaccessible to theirselves...)
In short, in my opinion, the map of a child's body, available for parents, possibly grandparents or siblings, looks like this: legs below the knees, hands whole with arms, head, neck, back whole to a safe distance from the buttocks (especially the caudal bone) and for very young children, belly above the navel, without nipples (also to boys; in them nipples are also erogenous). In case of further relatives or strangers, this body map is shortened to the hands, shoulders, and head.
Not touching children in this healthy Human way is as harmful to their emotional and sexual development as abuse. (if not more...) Such a pathology also damages the mental health and sexuality of whole families, which do not touch children at all. Taking this fact into account, I want to make you aware that the above mentioned law kills the Humanity under its yoke on the social level.
Worth mentioning is also the fact that in Scandinavia (as well as in Poland and many other countries, although to a slightly lesser extent) the effect of "fighting pedophilia" is a kind of 'nationalisation' of children. I have heard on TV that in Sweden EVERY FOURTH child was taken away from its parents... You don't believe that all these children have been molested? I don't know about you, but it sounds like a bad dream to me... And the fact that it is a direct result of "the fight against pedophilia" is obvious to me. Because the state "in the name of the higher good" takes control of children, diminishing the role, position and authority of parents. (in Scandinavia even nullifying it) And no one opposes this sick bureaucratic pathology because it could sometimes turn out that they "support pedophilia" or even "are pedophiles" themselves...
I believe that the United States is such a manifestation of the fact that it has broken down to all the limits of absurdity on this subject. Examples of this paranoia are "abusing children themselfes", "twenty-year-old children" and thirty years for a bathing.
There are cases in the USA where even a few years olds are accused of abusing slightly younger children. Admittedly, this is a problem if, for example, a seven-year-old boy touches a younger girl in the sandbox (something I have heard about once). Most likely, it was the result of the lack or shortage of this healthy parental touch, as I wrote above, although it is possible that there was some sexual abuse, as was happened in my case.
And as a result of the "fight against pedophilia", instead of normally setting boundaries for a boy by his parents and finding the cause of such behaviour to help him psychologically, the parents of this girl are dragging a small child to court for molesting! I don't even know how to name it, because the term "curious situation" is far too mild to express my emotions about it.
Another terrible absurdity is the "20-year-old children" in Texas, where voluntary sex with a 20-year-old girl could even be punished by the death! I understand the American law on alcohol, cigarettes and now marijuana, that you can only use it above twenty-one years old. I do not agree with this, but I do understand it, because between the age of 18 and the American border of maturity, human in some sense is still maturing.
Personally, I do not support any rigid age limits. Some grow up a little bit earlier, others a little bit later. Nevertheless, it is obvious to me that a few years of age, or even a dozen or so - closer to ten than twenty years of age - are unable to make ANY conscious LIFE CHOICE, INCLUDING ALL SExUALS! However, if someone under the age of eighteen didn't grow up to make conscious decisions about themselves, I think it's too late to protect them from anything (unless the situation is so bad that they need incapacitation).
Another such example was a Pole who got thirty years for bathing his daughter without a special glove. I personally support the idea of not touching children in intimate places with bare hands, even during bathing (except when it's necessary, such as applying cream, or putting a suppository in the case of children too young to do it on their own). This is a certain breaking of the boundaries of the body map I wrote about, whether it's who likes it or not... But the criminal Trynkiewicz, who should die slowly (...), came out prison after twenty-five years, and here in comparison with this we have insignificant minor offense (because I don't think that the intention of this Pole was abuse), deserving THIRTY YEARS?! Come on..
It is worth mentioning, however, that in the USA, they can at least talk freely about this paranoia, as well as about Nazism and other matters forbidden in Europe, where there is supposed to be freedom of speech, but in fact only within the limits strictly defined by the so-called 'political rightness' and 'European values'.
These legal bubbles are, in fact, the only real consequence of the tightening up of the law through the 'fight against pedophilia'. Because the real abusing of children has always outraged and will always outrage normal people. Do you really like this direction of change in the law...? I don't think so.
One girl, whom I have unnecessarily and thoughtlessly attacked on the Internet (today I regret it and I think there is nothing could add about it here), who "by a slippery slope" found out about my pedophilia and who unknowingly gave me the motivation to write this work, sent me a message where she asked if I knew that "pedophilia in Poland is punished". I have no intention of fighting her anymore, but let me answer her question here, in this work. -I just don't know that.
..I know that (VERY RIGHTLY) all forms of child sexual abuse are punished, but I haven't heard of a law in any country punishing pedophilia itself. If it was, it would have to sound like that:
"Anyone who publicly admits to having sexual inclinations or fantasies about children and/or to perceiving in them any sexual attraction, or it will be proved to have such an attraction (by discovering an interest in children's fashion, having, or viewing photographs of not their children, or observing and testifying by credible witnesses; friends, neighbors, colleagues, etc.) shall be punished by (...)".
Fortunately, there is no such thing anywhere. At least not yet, because the law in the UK is already very close to punishing pedophilia itself...
Various bubbles have arisen in connection with this psychosis, to which I am going to refer here, but this law, that is, the actual persecution of pedophiles for sexuality, and has nothing to do with child protection. The point is that in the UK, if someone who has a proven sexual interest in children has pictures of them, that will be treated by the justice system as child pornography, although that will be completely innocent, as pictures made by proud parents on the Instagram.
Even in the case of the other bubbles discussed here, one could find by force some intention to protect children. -But here? How do they want to prevent the filthy acts against them if they pump frustration among pedophiles in such a perfidious way? Besides, I'd ask the English themselves: what's wrong with someone admiring the beauty of your children? -What's so terrible about it? -Why? Child pornography is terrible because it's a registered filthy abuse that teaches abuse to others, but what can be terrible about admiring beauty? Masturbation...? As I've written, everyone is responsible for their actions. -But do you prefer your pedophiles to masturbate to the pictures you make public, or to think about other ways to satisfy themselves sexually? -Yeah.
No one can escape their libido, as is clearly seen among Catholic priests, where sexual pathologies multiply in them like mushrooms after rain through celibacy. So I guess it's better not to limit the possibility of sexual gratification to someone who doesn't do any harm and doesn't want to look at it or support it. (?) If you are so disturbed by the very fact that someone can admire the beauty of your children in pictures, just don't make them public. Problem solved.
Besides, how can you call pornography something that is not? Don't you see anything wrong with the fact that the pictures of your children you have taken yourself could be called "pornographic" in some English court, being used as evidence of sexual guilt against someone? I suppose you might think that masturbating to children's pictures 'offends their dignity'. But if that's the point, then try to answer yourself in what way. But calling them "pornographic" in my opinion is clearly doing it. I have never liked pornography of any kind... I just associate it with something dirty - and it's with all my libertarian approach to sex. If the point is that if something starts to get sexually aroused, it becomes "pornographic" automatically, how would some pretty actress posing in Playboy feel if someone said her session was pornographic?
I'm very attached to my collection... I remember how happy I was when thanks to "Little Prince" I discovered pages with little photo models. -that I could finally admire the beauty of tiny little pretty ladies without fear and legally... Although I am able to see the beauty and satisfy myself sexually with adult girls, but they never wanted me (at least those that I liked). Therefore, after many failures and love failures, and taking into account the fear that always accompanied me during flirting attempts, I simply gave up and stopped even dreaming about creating any relationship... And I always liked the girls more. So since I had the opportunity to admire them in the pictures, I became somehow 'fulfilled in life'... (if it could be call like that, considering my own limitations)
The legality of my cutties collection when I feel cursed and persecuted by everyone around me for my sexual orientation is the last bastion of my sense of sexual freedom. I can't imagine losing it... Especially since the girls in the pictures introduce 'colors' into my 'black and white' life. -It is for me, above all, the satisfaction of my sensitivity to beauty, because the beauty of the girls makes me feel something of affection... It is so emotionally deep that it is even hard for me to describe it... And you may believe it or not, but in my opinion, the satisfaction of libido is less important to me than just experiencing this admiration...
Now I'm going to take the care Polish law, which I've already mentioned in connection with Bear and his outlawed side...
This "prohibiting on promotion or support pedophile content" is first of all contrary to the Polish constitution, which prohibits the so-called "preventive censorship", and is also quite imprecise. {*} But what's problem - in something as 'noble' as "the fight against pedophilia", the constitution and the rule of law does not count for anyone (in this case not only for PiS). The so called 'Law on Beasts', which was supposed to keep the already mentioned Trynkiewicz in prison, is equally contradictory to the constitution, but I am not going to stick to it. (well, at least that's good...)
{*Although I condemn all forms of sexual abuse of children, can the Polish "justice system" manage to pull up this work under "pedophile content", because I do not present the word "pedophilia" in a pejorative sense? That's what this work is about, that this word in its true definition has absolutely no such meaning...! Besides, in my opinion, when they wanted to introduce something like that, out of respect for lawmaking, they should precisely define what the law is about - for example "(...) content promoting or supporting any violation of sexual integrity of people under fifteen years of age (...)". Because What means "pedophilic content"?! Personally, "pedophilic content", which offends me and my dignity, I know only from the media...! That's why, in my opinion, every MP and senator who voted "yes" simply spit on the seriousness of his office and lawmaking...}
Like I said, there is no good side of child sexual abuse. However, in order to change (straighten out) the convictions of a man who is errs, who generally wants to do well, but because of loneliness and the feeling of general hatred towards him, he has got a little lost (...) the worst thing you can do is gag him so that he can't speak and suffocate in his own frustration! {*}
{*I'll throw in a digression here that one paedophile I met on Virtous Pedophiles told me that such things should be censored, because thanks to such Bear, a lot of pedophiles probably took advantage of his "positive paedophile codex" and hurt children. Surely, but apart from children, everyone is responsible for themselves (Bear, from what he wrote, never abused any child), and besides, take understand that censorship does not solve problems at all, that it can only give these pedophiles the wrong conviction about the rightness of their demands. -Something like that: "they have no arguments against us, so they censor us..." It can also be added that this law will still not manage to cleanse even the ordinary Internet (clear net) from "positive pedophilia", if only because it operates only in Poland. (each country has their own bubbles... ) Therefore the only really effective solution to counteract this harmful philosophy is to confront it with the truth. -But for this it takes first rejection of another harmful philosophy, which by definition does not use the truth, but only dogma, threats and epithets, means "the fight against pedophilia".}
Agreement is based on dialogue; on a mutual desire to understand each other. And it is not about any acceptance of wild adoption, 'massages' or other crazy ideas of Bear, but only directing epithets and threats at him, how was he could understand anything? How was I supposed to understand if I didn't finally find a kindly person, ready to discuss it with me in Human terms? {*}
{*In Human terms, not like using below-the-belt punches like sexist associations or some kind of expression bomb, as my father always did. To be able to talk frankly and Humanly with some pedophile (who remained Human) about his sexuality, you have to stop associating it with any kind of getting to children (which he never did and he doesn't intend to if he remained Human). And to put it simply, to respect a man who wants a dialogue. My father has always preferred media-style debates, as he learned from mainstream television - not to get to the truth, but to destroy the opponent with his own arguments; to drag him into a blind alley to bend and feel like a winner... (and by the way feed on the frustration of the defeated one) I hate such like that...}
Gagging people's lips with "the fight against pedophilia" or "fight against hate speech" is fuelling social tensions, where there is no understanding of each other, but only more and more hatred on both sides.
Another, but much more harmful law against "pedophilia" is the total prohibition on parents of over seven years old from touching them in Sweden. In reference to the children, I have already written that it is a production of generations spoiled by the orphanage disease... 'In the name of the higher good', this law emotionally destroys whole generations of people, and many Scandinavians are certainly aware of this, but no one opposes it for fear of this terrible slander (...)!
Because the sexual sphere is strongly connected with the emotional sphere. They are not the same as Freud claimed, but they are completely interdependent mechanisms. If somebody has emotions in order and is generally happy in life, then one can safely assume that everything is fine with his sexual sphere. On the other hand, if someone suffers from depression, neurosis, anxiety, or other emotional disorders, something is certainly not right there...
And it is worth emphasizing here that this also applies to children. Of course, in children sexuality is realized a little differently, but it is a physiological need of every Human, the lack of which simply kills. There is such a thing as a body map. Everyone has it; different for parents, colleagues, lovers, and also children. (Lovers also sometimes have nooks and crannies inaccessible to theirselves...)
In short, in my opinion, the map of a child's body, available for parents, possibly grandparents or siblings, looks like this: legs below the knees, hands whole with arms, head, neck, back whole to a safe distance from the buttocks (especially the caudal bone) and for very young children, belly above the navel, without nipples (also to boys; in them nipples are also erogenous). In case of further relatives or strangers, this body map is shortened to the hands, shoulders, and head.
Not touching children in this healthy Human way is as harmful to their emotional and sexual development as abuse. (if not more...) Such a pathology also damages the mental health and sexuality of whole families, which do not touch children at all. Taking this fact into account, I want to make you aware that the above mentioned law kills the Humanity under its yoke on the social level.
Worth mentioning is also the fact that in Scandinavia (as well as in Poland and many other countries, although to a slightly lesser extent) the effect of "fighting pedophilia" is a kind of 'nationalisation' of children. I have heard on TV that in Sweden EVERY FOURTH child was taken away from its parents... You don't believe that all these children have been molested? I don't know about you, but it sounds like a bad dream to me... And the fact that it is a direct result of "the fight against pedophilia" is obvious to me. Because the state "in the name of the higher good" takes control of children, diminishing the role, position and authority of parents. (in Scandinavia even nullifying it) And no one opposes this sick bureaucratic pathology because it could sometimes turn out that they "support pedophilia" or even "are pedophiles" themselves...
I believe that the United States is such a manifestation of the fact that it has broken down to all the limits of absurdity on this subject. Examples of this paranoia are "abusing children themselfes", "twenty-year-old children" and thirty years for a bathing.
There are cases in the USA where even a few years olds are accused of abusing slightly younger children. Admittedly, this is a problem if, for example, a seven-year-old boy touches a younger girl in the sandbox (something I have heard about once). Most likely, it was the result of the lack or shortage of this healthy parental touch, as I wrote above, although it is possible that there was some sexual abuse, as was happened in my case.
And as a result of the "fight against pedophilia", instead of normally setting boundaries for a boy by his parents and finding the cause of such behaviour to help him psychologically, the parents of this girl are dragging a small child to court for molesting! I don't even know how to name it, because the term "curious situation" is far too mild to express my emotions about it.
Another terrible absurdity is the "20-year-old children" in Texas, where voluntary sex with a 20-year-old girl could even be punished by the death! I understand the American law on alcohol, cigarettes and now marijuana, that you can only use it above twenty-one years old. I do not agree with this, but I do understand it, because between the age of 18 and the American border of maturity, human in some sense is still maturing.
Personally, I do not support any rigid age limits. Some grow up a little bit earlier, others a little bit later. Nevertheless, it is obvious to me that a few years of age, or even a dozen or so - closer to ten than twenty years of age - are unable to make ANY conscious LIFE CHOICE, INCLUDING ALL SExUALS! However, if someone under the age of eighteen didn't grow up to make conscious decisions about themselves, I think it's too late to protect them from anything (unless the situation is so bad that they need incapacitation).
Another such example was a Pole who got thirty years for bathing his daughter without a special glove. I personally support the idea of not touching children in intimate places with bare hands, even during bathing (except when it's necessary, such as applying cream, or putting a suppository in the case of children too young to do it on their own). This is a certain breaking of the boundaries of the body map I wrote about, whether it's who likes it or not... But the criminal Trynkiewicz, who should die slowly (...), came out prison after twenty-five years, and here in comparison with this we have insignificant minor offense (because I don't think that the intention of this Pole was abuse), deserving THIRTY YEARS?! Come on..
It is worth mentioning, however, that in the USA, they can at least talk freely about this paranoia, as well as about Nazism and other matters forbidden in Europe, where there is supposed to be freedom of speech, but in fact only within the limits strictly defined by the so-called 'political rightness' and 'European values'.
These legal bubbles are, in fact, the only real consequence of the tightening up of the law through the 'fight against pedophilia'. Because the real abusing of children has always outraged and will always outrage normal people. Do you really like this direction of change in the law...? I don't think so.
8. False "fight against pedophilia" doctrines and their consequences
8. False "fight against pedophilia" doctrines and their consequences
The main false doctrine of "fighting pedophilia" is that paedophilia in itself is evil. I have already written a lot about the effects of this dogma, so I think there is nothing to repeat myself about. By planting seeds, you're harvesting crops - just to remind you, I think it's enough...
I have already mentioned the same way of thinking that 'pedophilia' is something 'extremely rare', 'extremely perverted', and that it always goes hand in hand with actions (in the guess that pedophiles who 'don't do' "pedophilia" yet are "bombs with delayed ignition"...). And for the strongest possible consolidation of this doctrine in the common consciousness, even new words are created, such as "nymphophilia", so that "pedophilia" itself can be reserved for men getting to young children. {*} Although this is not a subject to be spread over the x-es of the paragraphs, it is worth to realize that this doctrine is the basis for the existence and survival of the "fight against pedophilia". Because thanks to this, men who perceive beauty in a similar way to me (and in my opinion this is more than 1-3%), probably think to themselves: "Oh, shit...unfortunately, I've got it...what an idiotic fascination...because how can you get to children...but fortunately I also like mature girls...so it will never come out...(and of course -fuck the paedophiles!! {**})"
{*It is worth adding here that in this case we are dealing with a kind of 'conceptual evolution' in the direction, so to speak, of 'behaviorization' of the definition of the word "pedophilia"... In encyclopedias it is "a preferred form of sexual satisfaction (with children)", i.e. compared to my stand, it is only about 'sexual satisfaction' and the way of achieving it, as if the sexual perception of beauty, which is fundamental to the perception of one's own sexuality - OWN "I AM", was something insignificant at all and had no meaning (...). But it is still very mildly "behavioural" definitions, compared to the media, where "pedophile" is closely attached to "pedophilic acts" and without them does not exist...}
{**By which you're more or less consciously of it, you curse yourselves then!}
It is worth closing here the topic I have already written about, but as a complement to other threads - namely "asexuality of children".
Now remember the allegory of germination and the symbolism of the butterfly I quoted earlier. Children are innocent beings whose sexuality is still in its infancy. Innocent because they are naive and irresponsible and hard to blame for anything, and all the more reason to require them to make sensible choices in life. In turn their germinating sexuality is my allegory of the fact that helping or obstructing them is something very evil, pathological, and harmful for their entire development.
"Asexuality of children", on the other hand, is undermining the whole nature of sexuality, which is based on sexuality and acts through sexuality in general. Starting from the beginning - a human being are created thanks to the sexual intercourse of two people, which results from love (at least it should), which is also connected with sexuality. The formation of man in fetal life also has its own sexual nature, because as "secondary" organisms, we create, one can say, "from the back of the page".
But when it comes to the already born people themselves and their sexuality. -Orphan's disease harms the youngest children the most, because the older a person gets, the more resilient he is. Therefore, even in the Scandinavian countries, where they have almost completely gone mad fighting pedophilia, children can be pampered up to the age of seven. And this "pampering" is nothing else but a healthy (normal) satisfaction of their sexual sphere.
And what is most important in this subject is that denial of sexuality in children is just dangerous, because it universally retards the knowledge of the need to set boundaries for them. The fact that preschool children often try to break the sexual boundaries with people they trust is simply normal. Therefore, awareness of this and the ability to assertively set boundaries in relations with them is an absolute necessity, both for parents and for all who have contact with them.
Moreover, the widespread recognition of this physiological obviousness, which is contrary to the "fight against pedophilia", as well as of the fact that simply not setting boundaries to children; letting them touch you in intimate places, is a passive form of molestation, just as morally vile as the active one - it would end forever the possibility of putting forward brazen arguments of defense, often used by child abuse deviants that "they provoked them (...)". (Instead of "fighting against pedophilia", it would be ripostatized with dogmatic nonsense in the style that "it is not possible, because children do not have sexual energy".) Children simply have the right to be sexually unaware, to not know their own and our boundaries, they have the right to provide them with a guarantee of obeying them, and finally they have the right to blame in the future those who broke them, or even 'only' did not put them up them.
At the end of this thread we can also add that children often test their sexuality at a very young age, at the so-called "doctor games". In fact, I used to play like that myself and I think there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is purely for the satisfaction of curiosity and has nothing to do with sexual satisfaction. (which, in my opinion, always has its cause in other, conscious pathologies against children) It's just that children are sexually immature beings, but they're sexual - a human being is a sexual being already in the fetal life, even before he or she is fully human, that is, a breathing spiritual being.{*}
{*"The connection between the soul and the body occurs when the first breath is taken. And this is not my hypothesis, because the soul is directly connected with the breath. If you have any doubts, do yogic breathing exercises (on which all spiritual development is based) and you will see it for yourself...}
Another example of false doctrines is the saying that "pedophilia is a disorder (which needs to be treated)". If we separate paedophilia from any sexual abuse of children, it remains only a form of admiration for beauty. When it turns into obsession, yes, it can have its own pathological consequences, but only CAN HAVE! (It is mainly because of the "fight against pedophilia"...)
What about the abuses themselves? Calling criminals "sick" is Christianity in its worst form! -Whether it's sexual or any other matter... Such abuses are crimes, and often even terrible crimes, for which the guilty must be punished very severely - it is the only right and preventively effective cure for such a 'disease', which manifests itself in dehumanisation! But no "cure on pedophilia"! Pedophilia could have been (because it is possible that it wasn't even{*}) just one of the causes of this dehumanization!
{*Here we can boldly hypothesize that not all producers, especially distributors of child pornography, are with any sexual interest in children pedophiles. "Business is business..."}
The main false doctrine of "fighting pedophilia" is that paedophilia in itself is evil. I have already written a lot about the effects of this dogma, so I think there is nothing to repeat myself about. By planting seeds, you're harvesting crops - just to remind you, I think it's enough...
I have already mentioned the same way of thinking that 'pedophilia' is something 'extremely rare', 'extremely perverted', and that it always goes hand in hand with actions (in the guess that pedophiles who 'don't do' "pedophilia" yet are "bombs with delayed ignition"...). And for the strongest possible consolidation of this doctrine in the common consciousness, even new words are created, such as "nymphophilia", so that "pedophilia" itself can be reserved for men getting to young children. {*} Although this is not a subject to be spread over the x-es of the paragraphs, it is worth to realize that this doctrine is the basis for the existence and survival of the "fight against pedophilia". Because thanks to this, men who perceive beauty in a similar way to me (and in my opinion this is more than 1-3%), probably think to themselves: "Oh, shit...unfortunately, I've got it...what an idiotic fascination...because how can you get to children...but fortunately I also like mature girls...so it will never come out...(and of course -fuck the paedophiles!! {**})"
{*It is worth adding here that in this case we are dealing with a kind of 'conceptual evolution' in the direction, so to speak, of 'behaviorization' of the definition of the word "pedophilia"... In encyclopedias it is "a preferred form of sexual satisfaction (with children)", i.e. compared to my stand, it is only about 'sexual satisfaction' and the way of achieving it, as if the sexual perception of beauty, which is fundamental to the perception of one's own sexuality - OWN "I AM", was something insignificant at all and had no meaning (...). But it is still very mildly "behavioural" definitions, compared to the media, where "pedophile" is closely attached to "pedophilic acts" and without them does not exist...}
{**By which you're more or less consciously of it, you curse yourselves then!}
It is worth closing here the topic I have already written about, but as a complement to other threads - namely "asexuality of children".
Now remember the allegory of germination and the symbolism of the butterfly I quoted earlier. Children are innocent beings whose sexuality is still in its infancy. Innocent because they are naive and irresponsible and hard to blame for anything, and all the more reason to require them to make sensible choices in life. In turn their germinating sexuality is my allegory of the fact that helping or obstructing them is something very evil, pathological, and harmful for their entire development.
"Asexuality of children", on the other hand, is undermining the whole nature of sexuality, which is based on sexuality and acts through sexuality in general. Starting from the beginning - a human being are created thanks to the sexual intercourse of two people, which results from love (at least it should), which is also connected with sexuality. The formation of man in fetal life also has its own sexual nature, because as "secondary" organisms, we create, one can say, "from the back of the page".
But when it comes to the already born people themselves and their sexuality. -Orphan's disease harms the youngest children the most, because the older a person gets, the more resilient he is. Therefore, even in the Scandinavian countries, where they have almost completely gone mad fighting pedophilia, children can be pampered up to the age of seven. And this "pampering" is nothing else but a healthy (normal) satisfaction of their sexual sphere.
And what is most important in this subject is that denial of sexuality in children is just dangerous, because it universally retards the knowledge of the need to set boundaries for them. The fact that preschool children often try to break the sexual boundaries with people they trust is simply normal. Therefore, awareness of this and the ability to assertively set boundaries in relations with them is an absolute necessity, both for parents and for all who have contact with them.
Moreover, the widespread recognition of this physiological obviousness, which is contrary to the "fight against pedophilia", as well as of the fact that simply not setting boundaries to children; letting them touch you in intimate places, is a passive form of molestation, just as morally vile as the active one - it would end forever the possibility of putting forward brazen arguments of defense, often used by child abuse deviants that "they provoked them (...)". (Instead of "fighting against pedophilia", it would be ripostatized with dogmatic nonsense in the style that "it is not possible, because children do not have sexual energy".) Children simply have the right to be sexually unaware, to not know their own and our boundaries, they have the right to provide them with a guarantee of obeying them, and finally they have the right to blame in the future those who broke them, or even 'only' did not put them up them.
At the end of this thread we can also add that children often test their sexuality at a very young age, at the so-called "doctor games". In fact, I used to play like that myself and I think there is nothing wrong with that as long as it is purely for the satisfaction of curiosity and has nothing to do with sexual satisfaction. (which, in my opinion, always has its cause in other, conscious pathologies against children) It's just that children are sexually immature beings, but they're sexual - a human being is a sexual being already in the fetal life, even before he or she is fully human, that is, a breathing spiritual being.{*}
{*"The connection between the soul and the body occurs when the first breath is taken. And this is not my hypothesis, because the soul is directly connected with the breath. If you have any doubts, do yogic breathing exercises (on which all spiritual development is based) and you will see it for yourself...}
Another example of false doctrines is the saying that "pedophilia is a disorder (which needs to be treated)". If we separate paedophilia from any sexual abuse of children, it remains only a form of admiration for beauty. When it turns into obsession, yes, it can have its own pathological consequences, but only CAN HAVE! (It is mainly because of the "fight against pedophilia"...)
What about the abuses themselves? Calling criminals "sick" is Christianity in its worst form! -Whether it's sexual or any other matter... Such abuses are crimes, and often even terrible crimes, for which the guilty must be punished very severely - it is the only right and preventively effective cure for such a 'disease', which manifests itself in dehumanisation! But no "cure on pedophilia"! Pedophilia could have been (because it is possible that it wasn't even{*}) just one of the causes of this dehumanization!
{*Here we can boldly hypothesize that not all producers, especially distributors of child pornography, are with any sexual interest in children pedophiles. "Business is business..."}
9. "Fighting pedophilia" as a profitable business...
9. "Fighting pedophilia" as a profitable business...
The "fight against pedophilia", which perfectly fulfils its function of destroying humanity, has also become a machine for making money. The media live off the audience. This is not entirely true for the state media, because they are subsidised by the budget, but their lack of audience also has very unpleasant consequences for them.
In general, this is done in such a way that the viewership of each stations is completely measurable and transparent. And the higher the audience, the more willing advertisers in the advertising blocks and the higher the rate per second of the emitted advertisement. That is why, as I guess, the most expensive advertisements in Poland are during the breaks of our football team's matches.
The second such fundamental issue concerning the media and even more important in our deliberations is the shaping of the way of thinking of human masses. When it comes to such things as party wars, scandals, scams, etc., let's agree that the recipients of my work on which I count, do not take it seriously at all - simply for their own health, to stay relatively normal and to feel good in general, they are cutting themselves off from this spectacle served to the masses. Of course, I care about all people, but looking objectively at reality, I realize that it will be a huge success if I manage to speak to those who have now been caught up in the mainstream only by the 'fight against pedophilia'.
Because "fighting paedophilia" is the only thing that nowadays unites almost everyone above all divisions. Is that a conviction? Probably many people do, especially those whose beauty of children does not fascinate, and to an even greater extent those who build their worldview gazing at the TV-screen. Therefore, I take into account that many pedophiles who always wanted well for children (having ordinary human empathy) and during adolescence, entering into a mature relationship, quickly separated themselves from this fascination on a conscious level (they stopped, or even haven't started dreaming about sexual contacts with children) do not see anything wrong in this campaign. If they're fighting "pedophilia." (meaning abuse), that's all right - that's certainly the point of view of a lot of pedophiles.
Moreover, I would bet that such foundations as "Kid Protect" or "Nobody's Children" are crawling with pedophiles who want to do something good this way. (to prove to themselves that they are better, that they are not any "pedophiles"...) Do they do...? Some of their ideas were good, such as a fast line for children on social networking sites, etc., some were scandalous, as I described the "evil touch" spot. But the very activity of these foundations in the direction of "fight against pedophilia" is based on earning money through the phenomenon of "pedophilia". Jakob Śpiewak, the former head of "Kid Protect" convinced himself of this... I don't doubt his good intentions when he founded this foundation. But with time, penetrating deeper into it, he realized on his own mistakes that not many of his 'noble ideas' were left there.
The "fight against pedophilia", which perfectly fulfils its function of destroying humanity, has also become a machine for making money. The media live off the audience. This is not entirely true for the state media, because they are subsidised by the budget, but their lack of audience also has very unpleasant consequences for them.
In general, this is done in such a way that the viewership of each stations is completely measurable and transparent. And the higher the audience, the more willing advertisers in the advertising blocks and the higher the rate per second of the emitted advertisement. That is why, as I guess, the most expensive advertisements in Poland are during the breaks of our football team's matches.
The second such fundamental issue concerning the media and even more important in our deliberations is the shaping of the way of thinking of human masses. When it comes to such things as party wars, scandals, scams, etc., let's agree that the recipients of my work on which I count, do not take it seriously at all - simply for their own health, to stay relatively normal and to feel good in general, they are cutting themselves off from this spectacle served to the masses. Of course, I care about all people, but looking objectively at reality, I realize that it will be a huge success if I manage to speak to those who have now been caught up in the mainstream only by the 'fight against pedophilia'.
Because "fighting paedophilia" is the only thing that nowadays unites almost everyone above all divisions. Is that a conviction? Probably many people do, especially those whose beauty of children does not fascinate, and to an even greater extent those who build their worldview gazing at the TV-screen. Therefore, I take into account that many pedophiles who always wanted well for children (having ordinary human empathy) and during adolescence, entering into a mature relationship, quickly separated themselves from this fascination on a conscious level (they stopped, or even haven't started dreaming about sexual contacts with children) do not see anything wrong in this campaign. If they're fighting "pedophilia." (meaning abuse), that's all right - that's certainly the point of view of a lot of pedophiles.
Moreover, I would bet that such foundations as "Kid Protect" or "Nobody's Children" are crawling with pedophiles who want to do something good this way. (to prove to themselves that they are better, that they are not any "pedophiles"...) Do they do...? Some of their ideas were good, such as a fast line for children on social networking sites, etc., some were scandalous, as I described the "evil touch" spot. But the very activity of these foundations in the direction of "fight against pedophilia" is based on earning money through the phenomenon of "pedophilia". Jakob Śpiewak, the former head of "Kid Protect" convinced himself of this... I don't doubt his good intentions when he founded this foundation. But with time, penetrating deeper into it, he realized on his own mistakes that not many of his 'noble ideas' were left there.
However, not only am I sure, but I also know that many people are PERFECTLY aware of the harmfulness of the various effects of "fighting pedophilia". I know because, as somebody said before, "I'm a junkie after rehabs..." and in small therapeutic circles, some people showed the courage to gently say that they think it's going in an abnormal direction...
But this is where the media come into play, pushing people's "pedophilia" patterns into their heads, while at the same time determining how the 'public' shuld think about it. This is how this psychosis was created, and is constantly being re-creating. Note that some journalists seem to 'love' to use this word, to accentuate it specifically (to emphasize its 'pejorative nature'), or even as their 'point of honor' to use it as often as possible on the subject [male sexual abuse of children]... - "committed pedophilia", "pedophilic pornography", "pedophilic materials", "pedophilia phenomenon", "pedophilic behavior", "serial pedophile", "victims of pedophilia",{*} etc." - A large part of Human minds have managed to be trained in this way easily; the rest of them are simply AFRAID to oppose it.
{*Here it is worth mentioning the recent 'popular' in the media theme of "victims of pedophilia in church" to which this 'wonderful' Francis travels... I absolutely don't deny that these are victims and harmed people. However, they were not harmed by the concept of sexuality, but by a complete lack of empathy and respect for them as people and for their sexuality as children. -And they have not been harmed by any "pedophilia", whatever meaningful, but by specific criminals, acting like this since this pretending spirituality institution exists! (When I listen to journalists,sometimes I feel that soon they probably won't say that some priest raped or abused a child, but that he "pedophiled this child").
And with regard to this institution itself... Most people think that this present pope is so 'wonderful'... I can assure you that if the Catholic Church did not bow down and still had the power to murder and torture, you would see a completely different face of this 'wonderful' Jesuit! -Do you know who the Jesuits really are? If not, I refer you to read their oath... ("Uncle Google" will help you find it...)}
While people especially susceptible to their propaganda, who learned to feed on this shit, simply 'liked' such 'sensations'. Here we have this razor for making money. How many times have there been censorship shots of child pornography on TV or in the press before Child Liberation organization started flooding them with claims for possessing this pornography?
They do it in a calculating manner, because it increases their audience as well as the supply of such Polish newspaper rag as "Fakt". And it's about people they've learned to eat their dirt... The peak of insolence was the headline in the news ("Facts" by TVN) - "Pedophile wanted" in the context of an empty centre for "pedophiles" in Gostynin. It just so happens that they pressed this topic at the moment when there was some 'peace' and no 'spectacular' rapes or other such, called "pedophilia" happened. (it was a time when I still watched the news quite often) Well, then "the pedophile (is) wanted", because our audience is falling down, dear viewers..{*}
{*Same principle that Trynkiewicz was 'promoted'. This is not only about the audience, but also about the proverbial 'calling the wolf from the forest'. I've already mentioned planting the seeds. Just as associations like "stop pedophilia" do it on a smaller scale and mostly unconsciously, so the mass media on a mass scale consciously planting it to germinate them as further news!}
10. "Fighting pedophilia" as an ad hoc tool to destroy particular people
10. "Fighting pedophilia" as an ad hoc tool to destroy particular people
Although I fell a victim of "the fight against pedophilia" myself, but for me this case is now a closed one, so I don't really feel like describing the details of that incident. I'm not afraid of the truth about it, but I also don't doubt the good intentions of the people who slandered me, knowing only circumstantial gossip about it, which came from my private comments. That's why I don't intend to argue with them personally.
For me, Michael Jackson is such a model example of destroying someone with "pedophilia". If you continue to believe in these slanders about him, I will just remind you that the court has acquitted him of all the charges against him.{*} However, how many people do you think are left out of the slander of "pedophilia" innocently sentenced to prison (even more so in conditions of oppression by fellow inmates) thanks to slanders of wives, mothers, or already adult children who want to extort money from them, as was the case with Jackson?
{*So, if I were his family, I'd be thinking about compensation with the makers of Scary Film 3, 4. (and possibly other similar ones I don't know) for defaming his good name. It's a scandal to denigrate a man who has spent his entire life fighting to save this planet, especially children. Because he was a pedophile? Of course he was, but what if he never abused any children?! (Recently they started to slander him again, but I still don't believe in his guilt... A lot of children went through Neverland, and two of them decided to make money by spitting on their benefactor's grave...) Do you remember how he was judged? How did TVN show the toilet he's going to shit in when he's convicted?! (I suppose the media did the same in other countries) They have no moderation at all in their disgusting wickedness! Compare it with the way TVN shows Polanski's rapist, who in the US is so 'extremely wanted' that he's still driving around Europe, making movies and laughing at the girl he destroyed her life! (how this 'chasing' him looks to what they did with Assang, for example)}
Maybe this chapter is a bit short, as on the scale and seriousness of the problem it raises, but whatever... Innocently slandered and destroyed by "pedophilia" are certainly thousands of people around the world, but apart from the obvious cases of abuse, it would be very difficult for me in the current situation to decide who is and who is not guilty. That is why I decided not to defend the good name of anyone, except for the obvious example for me namely Michael Jackson...
Although I fell a victim of "the fight against pedophilia" myself, but for me this case is now a closed one, so I don't really feel like describing the details of that incident. I'm not afraid of the truth about it, but I also don't doubt the good intentions of the people who slandered me, knowing only circumstantial gossip about it, which came from my private comments. That's why I don't intend to argue with them personally.
For me, Michael Jackson is such a model example of destroying someone with "pedophilia". If you continue to believe in these slanders about him, I will just remind you that the court has acquitted him of all the charges against him.{*} However, how many people do you think are left out of the slander of "pedophilia" innocently sentenced to prison (even more so in conditions of oppression by fellow inmates) thanks to slanders of wives, mothers, or already adult children who want to extort money from them, as was the case with Jackson?
{*So, if I were his family, I'd be thinking about compensation with the makers of Scary Film 3, 4. (and possibly other similar ones I don't know) for defaming his good name. It's a scandal to denigrate a man who has spent his entire life fighting to save this planet, especially children. Because he was a pedophile? Of course he was, but what if he never abused any children?! (Recently they started to slander him again, but I still don't believe in his guilt... A lot of children went through Neverland, and two of them decided to make money by spitting on their benefactor's grave...) Do you remember how he was judged? How did TVN show the toilet he's going to shit in when he's convicted?! (I suppose the media did the same in other countries) They have no moderation at all in their disgusting wickedness! Compare it with the way TVN shows Polanski's rapist, who in the US is so 'extremely wanted' that he's still driving around Europe, making movies and laughing at the girl he destroyed her life! (how this 'chasing' him looks to what they did with Assang, for example)}
Maybe this chapter is a bit short, as on the scale and seriousness of the problem it raises, but whatever... Innocently slandered and destroyed by "pedophilia" are certainly thousands of people around the world, but apart from the obvious cases of abuse, it would be very difficult for me in the current situation to decide who is and who is not guilty. That is why I decided not to defend the good name of anyone, except for the obvious example for me namely Michael Jackson...
11. "The fight against pedophilia" and its antithesis
11. "The fight against pedophilia" and its antithesis
Here I'll have to go back to Bear and Child Liberation again. But first, I'll explain the title of the chapter itself. There is something that has always been used by "secret societies", secretly controlled by the Jesuits, such as the Illuminati or the Masons. This process was described by the philosopher Hegel - it is the creation of two opposing ideas/movements/organizations/"religions", the aim of which is to work out a predetermined result. These ideas are described as a thesis and antithesis, and the result as a synthesis. Officially, these options are deadly enemies, but in fact they have common creators who, at the highest levels of the hierarchy of these hostile ideas, secretly work closely together...
Islam, which is currently destroying Europe, has just been created by order of the Vatican to create 'religious' conflicts. (The rapist of little Aisha Muhammad, in fact, was their agent...) There was a time when this 'religiousness' in the world weakened and then for a while communism was the antithesis for "equality and freedom and brotherhood". But the struggle of Christianity (Christian 'values') against Islam, however, has again returned to life...
The expected synthesis in the case of 'religious' wars is for people to start demanding restrictions on civil liberties, which will precede their "New World Order". However, there are many more such artificial conflicts, such as the popularization of chauvinism (by means of films, hip-hop, or 'religion' as well) and, on the other hand, feminism, which is simply the antithesis of chauvinism, well pretending to be the 'fight for equality'. Another such example is the White and Black Racists. ..Not to mention the political parties...
The view promoted by these organizations is based on the assumption that children feel sexual pleasure in the same way as adults do (which, as you like it or not - it's true), so according to them "there are no contraindications for adults to enter into such contacts with children without harming them physically (and with 'mutual consent')". Now I know that this is nonsense, but it is a mistake of Humanity to react to such nonsense. (as well as often the very understanding of why it is nonsense -dogmatic 'asexuality'...).
The authors of these theses, who are behind these organizations are only a percentage of them. All the rest are the people they deceived, who will go away from them as soon as they understand their misconceptions. Apart from those who have been broken by this ideology by committing sexual crimes (which have irretrievably destroyed their Humanity...), but I'm sure there aren't that many of them...
For them it will certainly be a painful awakening, but it is better to shake them up with rational arguments, ramming the lies into which they have been entangled, than ramming them with epithets and threats from which they will take nothing but a sense of harm and greater and greater frustration.
Like dying plants that have 'helped' to germinate, or like damaged butterflies 'stroked' their wings, so children who have been sexually abused (even without physical harm and with a smile on their lips), entering adulthood are even doomed to emotional and sexual problems.{*} And that's because, contrary to 'common opinion', they are sexual beings! It's a bit like leading someone through a labyrinth by the hand with an eye patch and suddenly taking that eye patch off and leaving him alone in that labyrinth - because children are not able to define their needs/expectations and ESPECIALLY BOUNDARIES in any sexual relationship. And this cannot be circumvented or jumped in any way because it is impossible to teach the sexual perception of beauty, or generally to have one's own sexual expectations on a conscious level. Although children may 'learn' or even become addicted to sex, it will never be their conscious voluntary choice, let alone their initiative. Besides, the only theoretical explanation to children of what sex is about is an interference with their immature sexual nature. -From the simple fact that in this normally developing sexuality they do not manifest the need to have sex in terms of the needs of their psyche, perception of relationships with people and hormonal economy, not to mention anatomical considerations...
{*It even applies to communities where child pornography, or abuse itself, is an accepted 'generational tradition'. (in some "third world" countries such 'traditions' and 'customs' unfortunately exist and are also legal) Even without the sense of stigma of "victim of pedophilia" or any conscious admission of being a victim of abuse, such people have a completely disturbed emotional and sexual development, which I am myself an example of, although in comparison to many victims, it was only a 'minor episode...'. Various emotional disorders, self-esteem, sexual nature, as well as the very perception of one's sexuality (...) and addictions (including behavioural ones), are NOT assigned in this case to the awareness of being a victim. This certainly strengthens them, but their basis is 'help' in 'germinating', which wreaks havoc in the development of the emotional and sexual sphere of man even without awareness of it. All in all, the victims of "pedophilia" are also not fully aware of this, because today's common 'knowledge' does not give them information about their undeveloped sexuality and how it was damaged, basing it only on the perception of the "stigma of pedophilia".}
Sexuality, if it would not develop itself will be damaged - and that is not a hypothesis; that is certain! People fascinated by BDSM, or some harmful fetishes, are generally victims of sexual abuse. In addition, there are also some emotional problems in such a situation, resulting from hormonal imbalance (through unnaturally prematurely induced stimuli), as well as through the realization of the fact of being a victim.
{But the Child Liberation Communists have gone even further... They described the so-called "apartheid against children", proclaiming that children are equal adults ("only the smaller ones") and that they should be fully integrated into society. The communists generally have it in common that they can manipulate minds such beautifully in their vocabulary, sensing what their audience wants to hear from them...} Can you imagine what the consequences of such a law would have if children were to be considered responsible subjects...?
Even aside from younger children { according to C.L., children from 11/12 should have "completely equal rights" and to "sexual games" from 6...}, what would happen if, for example, a fourteen-year-old man inherits some landed property, or a corporation with full power and responsibility? What huge abuse could happen?! How many "advisors" would there be to exploit this fact?
But so is child labour. There are countries where small children work, or even fight in wars, and they don't see anything wrong with it, because nobody ever gave them any alternative! Just because they don't see anything wrong with it doesn't mean that everything is OK; they don't know what it's like to learn, play and don't care about the need to survive or to get food, etc. (under this "terrible apartheid")
With work and taking important life decisions responsibly is like with sex - it is impossible to give children a 'free choice' - it will always be someone else's choice! And that's why children's civil liberties must be restricted, to protect them from their natural naivety and the possibility of exploitation by others!{*}
{*"We are very complex organisms. When it comes to mind development, most of everyone on this planet... (except for dolphins, in some way) And the more evolutionary an organism is developed, the longer the period of its immaturity, called childhood in our species. We are not reptiles, or even more spiders, that it is enough to be born and you have to not only take responsibility for yourself, but also often f..k off from mother, hungry after the birth..}
And sometimes it is also worth imposing something on them (without 'respecting their liberties...'), such as learning to make the best use of their time, thanks to their parents{*}, to be able to pass through the period of their childhood carefree and safe, which in adulthood should only be a beautiful memory - if this is the case, it is a sign that the adults responsible for them have done well...
Always remember that there is absolutely nothing sick or perverted in your fascination with the beauty of children until you cross the boundaries of their innocence! The fact that children are generally cute, and above all girls, is so obvious to me that I feel that it is sick to deny it... You're not a monster and never let yourself be told it!!!
- "But whatever... nobody will ever discover me because I've never done anything and I certainly won't do anything to reveal me with the fact that I see beauty in children... I don't even dream of having sex with them, because it's a terrible thing, and besides, I love children and I just want their goodness, so KILL ALL 'PEDOPHILES...'. -I wonder how many of you think like that.
Because the founders of these organizations (commonly referred to as "pedophilic organisations") I actually doubt whether they dream of fulfilling their demands at all.{*} They are just to bewilder lonely frustrated pedophiles, to make them dream about children and having sex with them. Just as the media and the "warriors against pedophilia" attack their identity and dignity all the time on the one hand, so the "pedophilic organizations" make an emotional subterfuge on the other by reaching out to them and pretending to be their friends. The synthesis, i.e. the predicted and desired result of the clash of these theses, is another abuse that you call "pedophilia", as well as more and more social illnesses, taboos, misunderstandings and reasons for mutual suspicion and hatred.
{*In Spain, these demands were partly met because you could 'have sex' with 12-year-olds there for a while. And because of how they are and always have been Spaniards (the Inquisition, Korrida and these things...), it was possible to introduce it there. They have already withdrawn from it, when was exposed the fact that some girls were sold for 'weddings'...
But there are countries in Africa and the Middle East where even small children can be legally abused and raped... (even if it doesn't look like that in the eyes of some pedophiles, for me 'sex' with a few years old is simply rape, because [sex] is a voluntary and conscious choice - by assumption) In many of these countries it is also legal to register this, i.e. filming child pornography... While maintaining my position that the protection of the sexual integrity of children is something natural in our species, I consider that here too, as in the case of "the fight against pedophilia", 'religions' are to blame (especially Islam in this particular matter), which in themselves destroy Human nature. I think that such a situation fortunately does not threaten us, because the more civilized part of the world in which we find ourselves has already largely moved away from the abrahamic poisons - Christianity, Islam and their 'values'. In medieval Europe, raping children was also legal, and they simply have not yet come out of the political power of 'religions', that is to say, their own medieval times.}
These types of organisations also use various other arguments to support their (anti)-thesis. Because they are not people who love the truth, so they often use lies, just like the mainstream. I have already mentioned the argument of "common abuse of boys in Ancient Greece"... And I don't even think there's any point in making other similar ideas here..
Such nonsense simply serves to strengthen the dreams of children for their loyal readers. "That once upon a time there were better days, and now the world is such a bad and unkind for children deprived of their rights..." -What is the funniest, people on the other side of the barricade also believe in these absurdities, considering themselves civilized and seeing in the stigmatization of pedophilia (unfortunately not only "pedophilia", as abuse) "a step towards modernity", which is also strengthened by the media spreading "ways and remedies for pedophilia". This mechanism in a childishly simple way intensifies the hatred for "pedophilia" (including pedophilia) and everything associated with it.
In Polish chans, you can read every now and then how 'wonderful' is ( I quote) 'fucking children' and various 'tips' on this subject. And then you can hear in the media about some other pervert who tried or, what's worse, hurt some child. If you have encountered this phenomenon, I want to make you aware that this is not a "Polish Internet network of pedophiles", as it is called in the media (when they sometimes mention it), but at most a few provocateurs, encouraging various alarms, thefts, beatings, murders and just 'pounding children'... I suppose they act on behalf of the media to make as many Polish pedophiles as possible into perverts and monsters in order to be able to commonly capture such an image of "pedophiles" and "pedophilia". It's true that I have sometimes polemicized with them (to make others think) and I can understand those who, as I once was, are ideologically lost thanks to "positive pedophilia". But just to be clear: 'pounding children' and all their harassment is for me already and surely irreversibly one of the worst filths you can ever commit..
In turn when it comes to the history of approaching sexual contacts with children, pollution of their innocence has always been something terrible and morally unacceptable to all, at least to the extent of civilised and normal people. -millennia before such a pathology anyone called "pedophilia"!{*}
{*But the ruling clique never had any respect for their subjects and their children... Therefore, in the Middle Ages, when people were literally under the shoes of the Catholic Church, raping children was perfectly legal; at least among them - the Church's elite and 'magnates' chosen by them. Fortunately, in the nineteenth and twentieth century, people managed to get out of their shoes at least partly thanks to the development of knowledge and social awareness, as well as various processes such as wars, revolutions and subversions. And finally, these 'magnates', when they could no longer torture innocent people, understood that they would never succeed in convincing civilized people to accept in any way the filthiness of their children. So they decided to use this fact against us all... ...SO THE IDEA OF "FIGHTING PEDOPHILIA" WAS BORN IN THEIR MINDS...!!}
And in the end of this chapter... Don't mind me explaining some obvious things to most of you here. In my opinion, it is simply a much better idea to explain in detail and scientifically, health and HUMANS' point of view on any abuse of children than to do it in an obscene, perverse and extremely sexist way, really explaining nothing about it and assuming in advance that you "understand (support) or die". This is how any opportunity to reach out to the deceived victims{*} of Child Liberation, NAMBLA and similar organisations dies..
{*Despite some doubts I had while writing this, I think the word "victim" fits best here. In fact, we are all victims of "the fight against pedophilia" -...this terrible social psychosis... I will also insist that the overwhelming majority of pedophiles love children - in addition, that most of all NOT in the sexual sense of this word... This also applies to most of those who abuse children. I strongly emphasize that they are the criminals who harm them - they deeply damage their sexual and emotional development. However, thanks to the "pedophilic organisations" discussed here, they think and believe that the children they abuse benefit from it because DE FACTO it's could be enjoyable for them and if they do not inflict pain on them, it may look like this. On the other hand, thanks to "noble anti-pedo warriors", they feel cursed by the world around them for just seeing beauty in children. -No matter what they do with it at all. In addition, they do not hear any substantive arguments against the Communist Child Liberation gibberish (and simmilar), because "the fight against pedophilia" does not offer them something like that. That is why, even if they were punished with death, they could be often still unable to see and understand the harm they have done...}
Alienated people, closed in their worlds, may not understand certain things (obvious to you). This does not mean that they are stupid - in other things they can understand something much better than you... And besides, it's hard to understand when you don't get any chance to talk about the subject, and most of all when you don't have people close{*} around you... Besides, if you had explained it to them as I did in this chapter a long time ago, instead of throwing your hatred and invectives at them from all sides in advance, I am sure that the world would avoid many sexual abuses...
{*Really close, where in such a relationship you can tell about everything (and sexual problems are the most annoying and destructive when it comes to the psychological and emotional well-being of every Human being) - "the fight against pedophilia" and 'religions' defiance of Human sexuality very effectively, and globally eliminates the possibility of such relationships.}
Here I'll have to go back to Bear and Child Liberation again. But first, I'll explain the title of the chapter itself. There is something that has always been used by "secret societies", secretly controlled by the Jesuits, such as the Illuminati or the Masons. This process was described by the philosopher Hegel - it is the creation of two opposing ideas/movements/organizations/"religions", the aim of which is to work out a predetermined result. These ideas are described as a thesis and antithesis, and the result as a synthesis. Officially, these options are deadly enemies, but in fact they have common creators who, at the highest levels of the hierarchy of these hostile ideas, secretly work closely together...
Islam, which is currently destroying Europe, has just been created by order of the Vatican to create 'religious' conflicts. (The rapist of little Aisha Muhammad, in fact, was their agent...) There was a time when this 'religiousness' in the world weakened and then for a while communism was the antithesis for "equality and freedom and brotherhood". But the struggle of Christianity (Christian 'values') against Islam, however, has again returned to life...
The expected synthesis in the case of 'religious' wars is for people to start demanding restrictions on civil liberties, which will precede their "New World Order". However, there are many more such artificial conflicts, such as the popularization of chauvinism (by means of films, hip-hop, or 'religion' as well) and, on the other hand, feminism, which is simply the antithesis of chauvinism, well pretending to be the 'fight for equality'. Another such example is the White and Black Racists. ..Not to mention the political parties...
***
An antithesis was also created for "the fight against pedophilia"! Contemporary 'opinion makers', destroying Humanity with "the fight against pedophilia", have not forgotten to give pedophiles an 'alternative solution'. Not so widely available, but nevertheless... With a bit of embarrassment I must admit that once I was also fascinated by Child Liberation and other similar options...The view promoted by these organizations is based on the assumption that children feel sexual pleasure in the same way as adults do (which, as you like it or not - it's true), so according to them "there are no contraindications for adults to enter into such contacts with children without harming them physically (and with 'mutual consent')". Now I know that this is nonsense, but it is a mistake of Humanity to react to such nonsense. (as well as often the very understanding of why it is nonsense -dogmatic 'asexuality'...).
The authors of these theses, who are behind these organizations are only a percentage of them. All the rest are the people they deceived, who will go away from them as soon as they understand their misconceptions. Apart from those who have been broken by this ideology by committing sexual crimes (which have irretrievably destroyed their Humanity...), but I'm sure there aren't that many of them...
For them it will certainly be a painful awakening, but it is better to shake them up with rational arguments, ramming the lies into which they have been entangled, than ramming them with epithets and threats from which they will take nothing but a sense of harm and greater and greater frustration.
*****
That's why I'm giving you pedophiles, cheated and deceived by the communist stupidity, this substantive shock, which others have unfortunately neglected (...):Like dying plants that have 'helped' to germinate, or like damaged butterflies 'stroked' their wings, so children who have been sexually abused (even without physical harm and with a smile on their lips), entering adulthood are even doomed to emotional and sexual problems.{*} And that's because, contrary to 'common opinion', they are sexual beings! It's a bit like leading someone through a labyrinth by the hand with an eye patch and suddenly taking that eye patch off and leaving him alone in that labyrinth - because children are not able to define their needs/expectations and ESPECIALLY BOUNDARIES in any sexual relationship. And this cannot be circumvented or jumped in any way because it is impossible to teach the sexual perception of beauty, or generally to have one's own sexual expectations on a conscious level. Although children may 'learn' or even become addicted to sex, it will never be their conscious voluntary choice, let alone their initiative. Besides, the only theoretical explanation to children of what sex is about is an interference with their immature sexual nature. -From the simple fact that in this normally developing sexuality they do not manifest the need to have sex in terms of the needs of their psyche, perception of relationships with people and hormonal economy, not to mention anatomical considerations...
{*It even applies to communities where child pornography, or abuse itself, is an accepted 'generational tradition'. (in some "third world" countries such 'traditions' and 'customs' unfortunately exist and are also legal) Even without the sense of stigma of "victim of pedophilia" or any conscious admission of being a victim of abuse, such people have a completely disturbed emotional and sexual development, which I am myself an example of, although in comparison to many victims, it was only a 'minor episode...'. Various emotional disorders, self-esteem, sexual nature, as well as the very perception of one's sexuality (...) and addictions (including behavioural ones), are NOT assigned in this case to the awareness of being a victim. This certainly strengthens them, but their basis is 'help' in 'germinating', which wreaks havoc in the development of the emotional and sexual sphere of man even without awareness of it. All in all, the victims of "pedophilia" are also not fully aware of this, because today's common 'knowledge' does not give them information about their undeveloped sexuality and how it was damaged, basing it only on the perception of the "stigma of pedophilia".}
Sexuality, if it would not develop itself will be damaged - and that is not a hypothesis; that is certain! People fascinated by BDSM, or some harmful fetishes, are generally victims of sexual abuse. In addition, there are also some emotional problems in such a situation, resulting from hormonal imbalance (through unnaturally prematurely induced stimuli), as well as through the realization of the fact of being a victim.
{But the Child Liberation Communists have gone even further... They described the so-called "apartheid against children", proclaiming that children are equal adults ("only the smaller ones") and that they should be fully integrated into society. The communists generally have it in common that they can manipulate minds such beautifully in their vocabulary, sensing what their audience wants to hear from them...} Can you imagine what the consequences of such a law would have if children were to be considered responsible subjects...?
Even aside from younger children { according to C.L., children from 11/12 should have "completely equal rights" and to "sexual games" from 6...}, what would happen if, for example, a fourteen-year-old man inherits some landed property, or a corporation with full power and responsibility? What huge abuse could happen?! How many "advisors" would there be to exploit this fact?
But so is child labour. There are countries where small children work, or even fight in wars, and they don't see anything wrong with it, because nobody ever gave them any alternative! Just because they don't see anything wrong with it doesn't mean that everything is OK; they don't know what it's like to learn, play and don't care about the need to survive or to get food, etc. (under this "terrible apartheid")
With work and taking important life decisions responsibly is like with sex - it is impossible to give children a 'free choice' - it will always be someone else's choice! And that's why children's civil liberties must be restricted, to protect them from their natural naivety and the possibility of exploitation by others!{*}
{*"We are very complex organisms. When it comes to mind development, most of everyone on this planet... (except for dolphins, in some way) And the more evolutionary an organism is developed, the longer the period of its immaturity, called childhood in our species. We are not reptiles, or even more spiders, that it is enough to be born and you have to not only take responsibility for yourself, but also often f..k off from mother, hungry after the birth..}
And sometimes it is also worth imposing something on them (without 'respecting their liberties...'), such as learning to make the best use of their time, thanks to their parents{*}, to be able to pass through the period of their childhood carefree and safe, which in adulthood should only be a beautiful memory - if this is the case, it is a sign that the adults responsible for them have done well...
*
However, if you are a pedophile and you do not commit any crime in this connection, I think that in the end it is worth to crown this 'shock' with one more constructive remark.Always remember that there is absolutely nothing sick or perverted in your fascination with the beauty of children until you cross the boundaries of their innocence! The fact that children are generally cute, and above all girls, is so obvious to me that I feel that it is sick to deny it... You're not a monster and never let yourself be told it!!!
*****
Now let's consider what the purpose of this antithesis is - what is the expected synthesis... These creatures, like Child Liberation or NAMBLA and their stray 'disciples', like Bear, are only to incite hatred for "pedophilia" and, unfortunately, also for pedophilia in its true sense... On the other side of the barricade are slipped as "remediums for pedophilia" in order to make the atmosphere as much as possible more atmospheric as possible; in order to push all mankind into this trap as much as possible. And people later on are officially fascinated by such 'solutions' to murder for only pedophilia, although in fact many of them are also.- "But whatever... nobody will ever discover me because I've never done anything and I certainly won't do anything to reveal me with the fact that I see beauty in children... I don't even dream of having sex with them, because it's a terrible thing, and besides, I love children and I just want their goodness, so KILL ALL 'PEDOPHILES...'. -I wonder how many of you think like that.
Because the founders of these organizations (commonly referred to as "pedophilic organisations") I actually doubt whether they dream of fulfilling their demands at all.{*} They are just to bewilder lonely frustrated pedophiles, to make them dream about children and having sex with them. Just as the media and the "warriors against pedophilia" attack their identity and dignity all the time on the one hand, so the "pedophilic organizations" make an emotional subterfuge on the other by reaching out to them and pretending to be their friends. The synthesis, i.e. the predicted and desired result of the clash of these theses, is another abuse that you call "pedophilia", as well as more and more social illnesses, taboos, misunderstandings and reasons for mutual suspicion and hatred.
{*In Spain, these demands were partly met because you could 'have sex' with 12-year-olds there for a while. And because of how they are and always have been Spaniards (the Inquisition, Korrida and these things...), it was possible to introduce it there. They have already withdrawn from it, when was exposed the fact that some girls were sold for 'weddings'...
But there are countries in Africa and the Middle East where even small children can be legally abused and raped... (even if it doesn't look like that in the eyes of some pedophiles, for me 'sex' with a few years old is simply rape, because [sex] is a voluntary and conscious choice - by assumption) In many of these countries it is also legal to register this, i.e. filming child pornography... While maintaining my position that the protection of the sexual integrity of children is something natural in our species, I consider that here too, as in the case of "the fight against pedophilia", 'religions' are to blame (especially Islam in this particular matter), which in themselves destroy Human nature. I think that such a situation fortunately does not threaten us, because the more civilized part of the world in which we find ourselves has already largely moved away from the abrahamic poisons - Christianity, Islam and their 'values'. In medieval Europe, raping children was also legal, and they simply have not yet come out of the political power of 'religions', that is to say, their own medieval times.}
These types of organisations also use various other arguments to support their (anti)-thesis. Because they are not people who love the truth, so they often use lies, just like the mainstream. I have already mentioned the argument of "common abuse of boys in Ancient Greece"... And I don't even think there's any point in making other similar ideas here..
Such nonsense simply serves to strengthen the dreams of children for their loyal readers. "That once upon a time there were better days, and now the world is such a bad and unkind for children deprived of their rights..." -What is the funniest, people on the other side of the barricade also believe in these absurdities, considering themselves civilized and seeing in the stigmatization of pedophilia (unfortunately not only "pedophilia", as abuse) "a step towards modernity", which is also strengthened by the media spreading "ways and remedies for pedophilia". This mechanism in a childishly simple way intensifies the hatred for "pedophilia" (including pedophilia) and everything associated with it.
In Polish chans, you can read every now and then how 'wonderful' is ( I quote) 'fucking children' and various 'tips' on this subject. And then you can hear in the media about some other pervert who tried or, what's worse, hurt some child. If you have encountered this phenomenon, I want to make you aware that this is not a "Polish Internet network of pedophiles", as it is called in the media (when they sometimes mention it), but at most a few provocateurs, encouraging various alarms, thefts, beatings, murders and just 'pounding children'... I suppose they act on behalf of the media to make as many Polish pedophiles as possible into perverts and monsters in order to be able to commonly capture such an image of "pedophiles" and "pedophilia". It's true that I have sometimes polemicized with them (to make others think) and I can understand those who, as I once was, are ideologically lost thanks to "positive pedophilia". But just to be clear: 'pounding children' and all their harassment is for me already and surely irreversibly one of the worst filths you can ever commit..
In turn when it comes to the history of approaching sexual contacts with children, pollution of their innocence has always been something terrible and morally unacceptable to all, at least to the extent of civilised and normal people. -millennia before such a pathology anyone called "pedophilia"!{*}
{*But the ruling clique never had any respect for their subjects and their children... Therefore, in the Middle Ages, when people were literally under the shoes of the Catholic Church, raping children was perfectly legal; at least among them - the Church's elite and 'magnates' chosen by them. Fortunately, in the nineteenth and twentieth century, people managed to get out of their shoes at least partly thanks to the development of knowledge and social awareness, as well as various processes such as wars, revolutions and subversions. And finally, these 'magnates', when they could no longer torture innocent people, understood that they would never succeed in convincing civilized people to accept in any way the filthiness of their children. So they decided to use this fact against us all... ...SO THE IDEA OF "FIGHTING PEDOPHILIA" WAS BORN IN THEIR MINDS...!!}
And in the end of this chapter... Don't mind me explaining some obvious things to most of you here. In my opinion, it is simply a much better idea to explain in detail and scientifically, health and HUMANS' point of view on any abuse of children than to do it in an obscene, perverse and extremely sexist way, really explaining nothing about it and assuming in advance that you "understand (support) or die". This is how any opportunity to reach out to the deceived victims{*} of Child Liberation, NAMBLA and similar organisations dies..
{*Despite some doubts I had while writing this, I think the word "victim" fits best here. In fact, we are all victims of "the fight against pedophilia" -...this terrible social psychosis... I will also insist that the overwhelming majority of pedophiles love children - in addition, that most of all NOT in the sexual sense of this word... This also applies to most of those who abuse children. I strongly emphasize that they are the criminals who harm them - they deeply damage their sexual and emotional development. However, thanks to the "pedophilic organisations" discussed here, they think and believe that the children they abuse benefit from it because DE FACTO it's could be enjoyable for them and if they do not inflict pain on them, it may look like this. On the other hand, thanks to "noble anti-pedo warriors", they feel cursed by the world around them for just seeing beauty in children. -No matter what they do with it at all. In addition, they do not hear any substantive arguments against the Communist Child Liberation gibberish (and simmilar), because "the fight against pedophilia" does not offer them something like that. That is why, even if they were punished with death, they could be often still unable to see and understand the harm they have done...}
Alienated people, closed in their worlds, may not understand certain things (obvious to you). This does not mean that they are stupid - in other things they can understand something much better than you... And besides, it's hard to understand when you don't get any chance to talk about the subject, and most of all when you don't have people close{*} around you... Besides, if you had explained it to them as I did in this chapter a long time ago, instead of throwing your hatred and invectives at them from all sides in advance, I am sure that the world would avoid many sexual abuses...
{*Really close, where in such a relationship you can tell about everything (and sexual problems are the most annoying and destructive when it comes to the psychological and emotional well-being of every Human being) - "the fight against pedophilia" and 'religions' defiance of Human sexuality very effectively, and globally eliminates the possibility of such relationships.}
Subskrybuj:
Posty (Atom)